Thursday 15th July 2004 the BBC aired a television documentary
about an undercover investigation into a branch of the
British National Party (BNP),
the UKs leading anti-immigration and patriotic political
party. The programme was tentatively entitled 'Secret
Agent' and it charted two journalists 6 month infiltration
of the party with the obvious objective of 'digging
up dirt' on its members.
Naturally any dirt found could be presented in a way
to delegitimise the party, and ultimately British nationalism
itself. Andy Sykes, the
paid infiltrator, was shown interviewing several BNP
members, one of whom confessed to assaulting an Asian
man during race riots that have disturbed his region,
and another who admitted putting dog excrement through
a door of an Asian family. Both of these men were prospective
candidates for a local council election, and were personally
recruited by Sykes in his guise as a party organiser.
Sykes found these angry unstable
individuals after a tip off from Searchlight, a proclaimed
anti-fascist group run by Gerry Gable, a former member
of the UK Communist
co-reporter named Jason Gwynne asked an aggrieved BNP
member (who suffered a previous firebomb
attack on his car) what he thought about placing
a bomb in a skip outside a Bradford mosque, primed and timed
to detonate when the congregation departed.
as a result, are investigating whether legal action can
be taken against the reporter for inciting terrorism.
A scene was also shown of the party chairman Nick Griffin
giving a private speech to a small audience in which
he condemned the Islamic religion, calling it a "vicious
On the same
night after the programme was aired, a visibly strained Nick
Griffin appeared on BBC Newsnight to comment on the
program and defend his remarks caught on film. Mr Griffin
unabashedly apologised for the undisciplined behavior of the
angry working class men who admitted the offences. But he
also logically argued those men had been drinking beer when
questioned, and furthermore the program didn't explore the
background of the race riots which provoked their actions.
A substantial number of whites were injured in the Burnley
and Oldham racial incidents, and it is understandable that
any BNP supporters who were coincidentally there at the time
were fired up in the frenzy, if not acting in self-defence.
The Newsnight interview eventually moved on to Mr Griffins
comments about Islam. It is here that the BBCs hypocrisy really
becomes apparent. The interviewer interrogated Mr Griffin
as if he should be ashamed about expressing his revulsion
of Islam in plain language at a small private gathering! Mr
Griffin, unlike most career politicians in the main parties,
stood his ground on the subject by reiterating Islam is an
expansionist religion, and that the Koran states it may spread
by the sword. The BBC appears to have no concept of freedom
of speech, and would have the public believe that condemning
Islam as wicked vicious faith is a form of extreme bigotry.
Not only is such a vilification of free speech a clear exaggeration,
it is blatantly hypocritical. Why is it that the BBC have
downplayed the genocide of hundreds of whites by blacks in
and South Africa, without any TV documentaries highlighting
The answer to any perceptive observer
is that such coverage would not serve the BBCs liberal anti-white
agenda. That is, the notion that only whites commit racial
attacks, and that whites must not subscribe to identity
For many years the BBC has been a respected bastion of journalistic
integrity around the world. It has been traditionally perceived
as being objective and impartial on the topics it reports.
The exception to this general rule is its coverage and spin
on social issues relating to race and immigration. Like most
other Anglophone mainstream media outlets, it inevitably takes
a left-wing stance on the subject. Immigration is portrayed
as universally beneficial; the supposed economic benefits
of it are extolled, avoiding scrutiny of the long term
social/cultural implications to the receiving population.
On race, where interracial conflicts are concerned, only crimes
committed by whites against ethnic minorities are usually
publicized. The racially motivated murder of white teenager
in Oldham, England in 2002 by a gang of Asians was virtually
ignored by the BBC and national press.
Go to the BBC home page and do a search
on "Gavin Hopley" with the BBC News option ticked. Only 1
page is retrieved, and that particular article was published
almost 2 years after his death.
Doing the same
search on Stephen Lawrence, a black teenager murdered by whites
in Eltham, London in 1993 returns a staggering 524 article
links on 53 pages at last count. So, for all its objectivity,
the BBC establishment are aware of the impressions their reporting
will have on the public.
hear much about the media being "controlled" nowadays
on free expression web sites.
This reference is mainly an alternative coded phrase
for its anti-white bias, or tendency to bypass concerns
that people of European descent have on racial issues.
Friday morning Barclays Bank joined the attack on the British
National Party by announcing it intends to freeze the party's
bank accounts on the basis of 'reputation'. This in part
was a knee jerk reaction from a national newspaper threatening
to reveal BNPs accounts with Barclays. This is another dubious
excuse from a major institution, as most people don't know
or even care where BNP party funds are held.
stuffy politicians and trendy media types who say the BNP
shouldn't be allowed to exist because it has a few bad apples
in it applied the same principle to other parties then there
wouldn't be much of a political landscape to speak of. Both
the Labour and Conservative parties have been dogged
by political scandals for years, such as sexual affairs,
improper financial dealings, and perjury to name a few.
It is human nature that any party will include members who
cannot control their behavior at all times. Of all parties,
the BNP has been held to a higher standard of conduct in
the eyes of the media and police. Nick Griffin himself is
well aware of how his opponents would welcome the the party's
demise by exposing a major scandal, or stereotyping it as
a group of unreasonable racialists. It's tragically ironic
how the major parties can tolerate the unwarranted invasion
of Iraq, with the loss of thousands of lives, yet vilify
a party that simply wants to preserve the racial and cultural
cohesion of the UK.
most disturbing aspect of the BBC assault on the BNP,
and Barclays subsequent plan to freeze its accounts, is
how virulently opposed the media
establishment are to a party that stands up for the
interests of the British people. The main reason the BNP
has rapidly grown in recent years is due to the utter failure of
past Labour and Conservative governments to halt the flow
of prospective asylum seekers and immigrants into the country.
Then there is the issue of the deterioration of kinship
and community life in British society, and the demoralizing
effects of political correctness in education and social
policy. If for whatever reason the BNP
was banished from politics, likely via the back door tactic
of denying it a bank account, then it would be a sad day
The 40 most wanted
Lee Barnes, a British
columnist, on the New
The Race Riots 2001 - 2002 -
Chicken - Tikka - Masala - Britain
prominent Labour party member says he will sue
police after being arrested and allegedly beaten
during clashes in Burnley. Shahid Malik, 33, who
sits on Labour's national executive and is a member
of the Commission for Racial Equality, was hurt
during an outbreak of violence on Monday night."
Malik, who lives in Burnley and is the son of
the town's deputy mayor, said he had been trying
to stop the violence."
Three separate enquiries
in Burnley, Oldham, and Bradford, have placed
the blame firmly at the door of the Asian Communities.
NOT the native population, and NOT the BNP.
The 40 most